PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 4, 2025Small7 citations

Porous Carbons with Tunable Mesoporous Structure Induced by Coupled Chemical Activation for High‐Performance Zinc Ion Hybrid Capacitors

View Full Paper
CWCaiwei WangYLYangzi LuoHHHaodong Huang

Key Points

  • Superior energy density of 121 Wh kg −1 observed in zinc ion hybrid capacitors with optimized porous carbons.
  • Pore structures improved using sodium cyanate and sodium carbonate, yielding micropores and mesopores.
  • Assessment of porous carbon nanosheets demonstrated enhanced charge storage and rapid Zn 2+ ion transportation.
  • Findings indicate that tailored micropore ratios facilitate robust storage and kinetics in energy applications.

Abstract

Abstract Pore structure is the foundation for the capacitive performance of porous carbons. Micropores are pivotal spaces for storing hydrated Zn 2+ ions. Elucidating the charge storage mechanism of micropores is essential to develop porous carbon cathodes for zinc ion hybrid capacitors (ZIHCs). Herein, a coupling strategy of NaOCN and Na 2 CO 3 activation is developed to regulate the pore structures of porous carbon nanosheets (PCNs). NaOCN, in situ formed by cyanide groups reacting with partial Na 2 CO 3 , couples with Na 2 CO 3 activation to construct 0.6–1 nm and 1–2 nm micropores. Excessive NaOCN activation causes the collapse of 0.6–1 nm micropores and formation of 2–4 nm mesopores by the generated NaCN template. 0.6–1 nm micropores serve to store Zn 2+ ions. 1–2 nm micropores and 2–4 nm mesopores are responsible for rapidly transporting Zn 2+ ions. Benefiting from the highest 0.6‐1 nm micropore ratios (23.8%) and 1–2 nm micropore ratios (30.0%) that facilitate robust Zn 2+ ion storage and fast kinetics, the optimized PCNs (PCN‐0.5) deliver superior specific capacitance, remarkable rate capability and excellent durability. The assembled PCN‐0.5//Zn ZIHCs exhibit a high energy density of 121 Wh kg −1 at 80 W kg −1 and 44 Wh kg −1 even at 40435 W kg −1 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6930e8c6ea1aef094cca363fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202513271
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper