Meta-analysis reveals significant association of urinary KIM-1 with acute kidney injury in neonates, suggesting its potential as a reliable biomarker.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant clinical concern in neonates, threatening optimal outcomes. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial; however, current methods lack sufficient sensitivity. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (uKIM-1) for AKI in neonates by quantifying differences in uKIM-1 levels between AKI and non-AKI neonates. We systematically searched major databases for comparative studies. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. A random-effects meta-analysis estimated the pooled Hedges’ g in uKIM-1 levels, accounting for heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses explored sources of heterogeneity (continent, study design, sampling time, AKI definition). Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s and Begg’s tests, as well as with a funnel plot. Data from 13 studies involving 552 neonates indicated a significant association between elevated uKIM-1 levels and AKI. High heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 80.32%). The pooled Hedges’ g was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.16–1.07, p = 0.01). Subgroup analysis showed stronger associations in African studies (Hedges’ g = 2.12), those using KDIGO (Hedges’ g = 0.96), cohort studies, and sampling within 2–4 days (Hedges’ g = 0.76). No publication bias was detected. This meta-analysis synthesizes evidence on uKIM-1 as an AKI biomarker. While uKIM-1 shows promise, high heterogeneity and diagnostic performance warrant further research to improve AKI detection and management in neonates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Praditaukrit et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: