Computational model reveals injection velocity impacts ice formation in ballast water, indicating optimized design for polar vessels.
The phenomenon of seawater flow-freezing exists during ballast water injection and drainage in polar vessels, but the heat transfer and ice evolution behaviors under low-temperature flow conditions remain unclear. This study developed a computational model for ballast tank freezing using the volume of fluid (VOF) and enthalpy–porosity method, and constructed a scaled experimental platform for the simulation model validation. Based on this model, the flow-heat transfer and ice evolution process in the ballast tank are analyzed in detail, with a focus on the influence of injection velocity, pipe diameter, and position on seawater freezing characteristics. The results show that during low-temperature water injection, phase change occurs preferentially in the tank bottom region, with ice presenting as a slurry morphology; when injection velocity increases from 0.25 m/s to 3.5 m/s, the maximum ice-phase volume fraction increases by 48.9%, indicating faster flow accelerates phase-change freezing; compared to other diameters, DN150 piping exhibits the highest turbulent kinetic energy (0.054 m2/s2) and the maximum shear stress (12.49 Pa), demonstrating optimal freezing resistance; compared to bottom injection, sidewall injection intensifies heat transfer/icing near tank walls and increases ice-clogging risk around ports. This study reveals intrinsic mechanisms of dynamic ice-blockage evolution, providing theoretical basis for anti-clogging design in polar ship systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: