Analysis reveals obesity impacts fertility-preserving options in endometrial cancer, indicating GLP-1 RAs may enhance current therapies.
Endometrial cancer (EC) incidence and mortality is rising globally, largely driven by the obesity epidemic. Treatment options remain limited for obesity-associated, hormone-resistant, or fertility-preserving EC, highlighting the need for novel therapies that address both tumor biology and metabolic dysfunction. Here, we synthesize the molecular rationale, preclinical, population-based, and emerging clinical trial evidence on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in EC. GLP-1R is expressed in benign and malignant endometrial tissues, where activation of cAMP–PKA and AMPK–mTOR signaling has been shown to mediate antiproliferative, proapoptotic, and autophagy-inducing effects. Preclinical models demonstrate that class-wide GLP-1 RAs may restore progesterone receptor expression, overcome hormone resistance, and synergize with progestin therapy; however, the effects may vary by agent. Retrospective studies suggest that combining GLP-1 RAs with local progestin therapy, commonly a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (preferred in obesity because oral progestin bioavailability is reduced), is associated with reduced EC in high-risk women. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing their role in fertility-sparing settings—evaluating complete response to progestin-based therapy, relapse rates, and time to conception—as well as in adjuvant settings, where disease-free survival is a key endpoint; however, gastrointestinal tolerability and the absence of long-term safety data in EC populations remain important considerations. As a class, GLP-1 RAs represent a promising therapeutic approach to targeting both the obesogenic milieu and tumor-intrinsic pathways in EC; however, agent-specific differences warrant attention. Prospective, subtype-stratified trials are essential to establish their role in comprehensive EC care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Podder et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: