Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meta-analysis reveals cervical collar might increase intracranial pressure in trauma patients, suggesting a careful approach in brain injury management.
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of neck stabilization with cervical collar on optic nerve strength diameter. Methods: A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and Web of Science databases from their inception to December 22, 2021 was conducted. The search was conducted using the terms: “cervical collar” OR “collar” AND “intercranial pressure” OR “optic nerve strength diameter” OR “ONSD” OR “traumatic” OR “brain injury” and restricted to English language documents. Results: The pooled analysis showed that optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) without collar was 4.5 ± 0.9mm. After insertion of the cervical collar and stabilization of the cervical spine for 20 minutes, an increase in ONSD was observed (4.9 ± 1.5mm; SMD = 0.89; 95%CI: 0.39 to 1.39; p =0.01). In clinical trial ONSD at baseline (4.8 ± 0.9mm) and 20-minutes after fitting the flange (5 ± 0.9mm; SMD = 0.22; 95%CI: -0.07 to 0.51; p =0.13). In experimental trials, the pooled analysis showed statistically significantly higher ONSD values for a 20-minute cervical collar application (4.86 ± 1.74 vs. 4.35 ± 0.91mm, respectively; SMD = 1.05; 95%CI: 0.46 to 1.65; p <0.001). Discussion and Conclusion: Our meta-analysis showed that stabilizing the cervical spine with a cervical collar increases the intracranial pressure even in healthy volunteers, with the NextSplit collar being the least stressful. Large prospective, randomized studies are needed to confirm the obtained results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ladny et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: