PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 5, 2025Frontiers in Neurology2 citationsOpen Access

Non-invasive brain stimulation for the improvement of lower extremity motor function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

View Full Paper
JLJiayu LiXZXin ZhouZWZhen Wu

Key Points

  • Meta-analysis reports improved lower extremity function in poststroke patients using non-invasive brain stimulation techniques.
  • Key measures included Barthel index and timed up and go test, with notable improvements observed post-treatment.
  • Systematic review combined results from multiple studies to compare effectiveness of different stimulation techniques.
  • Findings highlight the potential of non-invasive brain stimulation to enhance motor function and clinical outcomes.

Abstract

Objective To explore and compare the effectiveness of various non-invasive brain stimulations (NiBS) on poststroke lower extremity disorders. Methods We searched for and gathered studies from Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, with the most recent search carried out on 5 October 2024. All published studies meeting the eligibility criteria and investigating the effectiveness of NiBS in patients with poststroke lower limb disorders were included. A total of 29 studies involving 1,319 participants were reviewed. Two independent researchers extracted clinical characteristics and research data. Outcome measures included the Fugl–Meyer lower extremity scale, Barthel index, Berg balance scale (BBS), and timed up and go test. Standard pairwise meta-analysis results and treatment network geometry were generated using Stata MP version 15.0. Bayesian network analysis was conducted using R version 4.4.1 with the “BUGSnet” package. Conclusion The meta-analysis shows that low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) and rTMS + transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are effective neurostimulation therapies for enhancing poststroke lower limb motor function. Probability rankings indicate that, among all NiBS interventions examined, rTMS + tDCS may be the most effective. In terms of body balance, intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and LF-rTMS improved poststroke balance, with iTBS possibly being the most effective. For activities of daily living, iTBS, LF-rTMS, and rTMS + tDCS demonstrated beneficial effects, with LF-rTMS potentially being the most effective among them.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/693231118e51979591dcdf5bhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1664707
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for spasticity and upper limb motor function in stroke patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis2026
  2. 2Non-invasive brain stimulation for stroke-related motor impairment and disability: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis2025 · 6 citations
  3. 3Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for lower limb motor impairment in post-stroke hemiplegia: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis2026
  4. 4Effects of the intermittent theta burst stimulation on gait, balance and lower limbs motor function in stroke: study protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial with multimodal neuroimaging assessments2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1653 EFFECTS OF NON-INVASIVE BRAIN STIMULATION ON UPPER LIMB MOTOR RECOVERY AFTER STROKE2026