Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigations show semantic and syntactic processing vary by reading direction fluency, pointing to insights on reading behavior.
This study aimed to investigate how semantic and syntactic parafoveal processing differ between fluent left-to-right and non-fluent right-to-left reading directions in individuals accustomed to left-to-right reading. A self-paced rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task was employed to evaluate semantic and syntactic congruency effects. Participants, familiar with left-to-right reading, were tested under conditions simulating both fluent left-to-right and non-fluent right-to-left reading directions. In the fluent left-to-right reading presentation, both semantic and syntactic congruency effects were significantly observed in the RVF. Conversely, in the non-fluent right-to-left reading presentation, syntactic congruency effects were observed in the LVF, while semantic congruency effects were notably absent. Additionally, syntactic congruency effects emerged at the LVF in left-to-right reading presentation and at the RVF in right-to-left reading presentation, demonstrating the flexibility of syntactic processing mechanisms across reading contexts. The findings reveal a dissociation between semantic and syntactic processing in parafoveal regions based on fluency of reading direction. Syntactic information serves as a foundational element, adaptable across reading contexts, emphasizing its hierarchical role in parafoveal processing. The current study provides a basis for future exploration of cross-linguistic variations and cognitive adaptations in reading behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sangyub Kim (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: