Computational analysis reveals hydrogen bonding stability in water–chalcogen heterodimers, suggesting implications for molecular interactions.
We assess the competing preference for hydrogen and chalcogen bonding in the aqueous heterodimers of the chalcogen hydrides H₂O-H₂X (X = S, Se, Te). We employ the CCSD(T) method near the complete basis set limit and include an explicit account of anharmonic zero-point energy corrections to establish accurate binding energies. We identify three bonding motifs in the H₂O-H₂X dimers, namely, H₂X (i) donating a hydrogen bond, (ii) accepting a hydrogen bond, and (iii) donating a chalcogen bond, and observe the emergence of chalcogen bonds to water for H₂Se and H₂Te. The hydrogen bond donated by a water molecule is consistently more stable than the hydrogen bond donated by the H₂X (X = S, Se, Te) molecule, with the strength of the former decreasing by a smaller margin than the latter down the chalcogen series. Conversely, the chalcogen bond becomes stronger progressing from H₂Se, in which it is weaker, to H₂Te, in which it is more stable than the two other bonding motifs. As a result, the global minimum for H₂O-H₂Te is chalcogen bonded. The analysis of the bonding using quasi-atomic orbitals (QUAOs) offers insights into the nature of the chalcogen- and hydrogen-bond accepting bonding motifs. Specifically, the water molecule prefers to accept hydrogen bonds from its mixed s/p hybrid lone pair and chalcogen bonds from its primarily p-hybridized lone pair. In contrast, the heavier chalcogen hydrides prefer to accept hydrogen bonds from their primarily p-hybridized lone pairs. A remarkable linear correlation exists between the QUAO-derived atomic charges localized on the donor and acceptor heavy atoms and the respective binding energies of the heterodimers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoffman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: