Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis shows how the Fear Z Function reveals asymmetric volatility decay in financial markets, suggesting a behavioral approach incorporating loss aversion and negativity bias.
Purpose This study introduces the Fear Z Function, a behavioral volatility framework that integrates psychological persistence and market momentum into the modeling of VIX decay. The purpose is to move beyond statistical asymmetry toward a model that explicitly captures fear as a dynamic, measurable emotional process. Design/methodology/approach We analyze VIX and S&P 500 data (1990–2025), identify shocks using a 20% threshold and test robustness with sensitivity ranges from 15 to 30%. Model parameters are estimated through constrained nonlinear optimization with clearly defined ranges. We evaluate fit against exponential decay and situate Fear Z relative to EGARCH, HAR-RV and sentiment-based ML approaches. An applied example from the March 2020 COVID-19 shock illustrates the model’s forecasting relevance. Findings The results confirm that fear decays asymmetrically and persists longer under negative momentum (ANOVA p < 0.001). The model replicates the COVID-19 spike with high precision (R2 = 0.94) and correctly forecasted the 2025 VIX decay in real time. Sensitivity analysis shows conclusions are robust across thresholds. Compared to conventional models, Fear Z provides a fit on par or better while adding behavioral interpretability. Originality/value This paper is the first to embed behavioral psychology – loss aversion, negativity bias and emotional inertia – directly into volatility decay modeling. It demonstrates that volatility is not a purely mechanical process but a measurable emotional cycle. The contribution is both theoretical (a structured behavioral model of fear) and practical (a forecasting tool for traders and risk managers).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sangphill Kim (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: