Analysis reveals limiting effects of sulfur on nitrogen nutrition in Norway spruce and European beech, suggesting nutrient-sparing strategies.
Calculating regressions between main foliar nutrient elements from German forest survey data reveals a relationship between S and N for beech, spruce, pine, and oak. For beech and spruce this relationship can be interpreted as a limiting effect of S on N, as known in agriculture and compensated there by S‐fertilization. Due to strongly reduced emissions, also in forestry S is more and more changing from surplus to deficiency. As fertilization is not an option in this respect, nutrient‐sparing forest management is the only viable approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Göttlein et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: