Analysis reveals digital platforms exacerbate structural violence in rehabilitation, indicating further inequalities in drug control efforts.
This article investigates how China's smart drug-control systems, an emerging representation of digital platforms designed for community-based drug rehabilitation, reproduce and amplify structural violence, imposing punishment under the guise of improving the effectiveness of rehabilitation. Drawing on observation and semi-structured interviews conducted in three mainland Chinese cities, we identify three forms of violence embedded in the digital rehabilitation: labelling violence , which reduces complex individuals to algorithmically produced risk scores; silent violence , which recodes emotional withdrawal or digital non-participation as non-compliance; and classification violence , which repurposes recovery as a tool for state-led stability maintenance. These findings advance critical criminology and digital governance studies by demonstrating how digital technologies, overclaiming the balance of rehabilitation rationality and administrative efficiency, transform rehabilitative care into a mechanism of biopolitical control. Ultimately, we argue that digitalisation in rehabilitation does not necessarily signify progress or inclusion; rather, it often obscures and intensifies inequalities in new, technocratic forms. Research and policy implications of this study are also addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: