PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 6, 2025Frontiers in Neurology4 citationsOpen Access

Development and validation of explainable machine learning models for predicting 3-month functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: a SHAP-based approach

View Full Paper
ZRZhengxu Ren

Key Points

  • The random forest model achieved superior accuracy in predicting functional outcomes at 3 months post-acute ischemic stroke.
  • AUC of 0.91 and sensitivity of 0.95 were recorded, indicating strong predictive capabilities for the acute ischemic stroke model.
  • Retrospective cohort study included 538 acute ischemic stroke patients and employed various machine learning techniques for outcome prediction.
  • SHAP analysis underpins interpretability in clinical settings, suggesting machine learning can enhance decision-making for acute ischemic stroke patients.

Abstract

Objective To develop and validate explainable machine learning models for predicting 3-month functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 538 AIS patients admitted within 72 h of symptom onset. Patients were randomly divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were collected. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression was used for feature selection. Five machine learning models were developed: support vector machine, k -nearest neighbors, random forest, gradient boosting machine (GBM), and convolutional neural network. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. SHAP analysis was applied to the best-performing model to enhance interpretability. Results Among 538 patients (mean age 68.5 ± 12.7 years, 58.0% male), 34.2% had poor 3-month outcomes (mRS 3–6). The GBM achieved the best predictive performance with AUC of 0.91, accuracy of 0.81, sensitivity of 0.95, and specificity of 0.61 in validation set, significantly outperforming logistic regression (AUC = 0.78). The model demonstrated excellent calibration and superior net benefit in decision curve analysis across threshold probabilities of 0.1–0.7. SHAP analysis identified admission NIHSS score (30.8%), age (14.9%), and ASPECTS ≥7 (13.7%) as the most influential predictors, with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (10.1%) and platelet distribution width (9.7%) also contributing significantly to outcome prediction. Conclusion Explainable machine learning models can accurately predict 3-month functional outcomes in AIS patients. The SHAP framework enhances model transparency, addressing interpretability barriers for clinical implementation while maintaining superior predictive performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhengxu Ren (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69337cceb3f947a0a1259b96https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1678815
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper