Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis detected X-ray emission in a nonrepeating fast radio burst, suggesting a unique source of energy distribution.
The physical origin of fast radio bursts (FRBs) remains uncertain. Although multiwavelength observations have been widely conducted, only Galactic FRB 20200428D is associated with an X-ray burst from the magnetar SGR J1935+2154. Here we present multiwavelength follow-up observations of the nearby bright FRB 20250316A, including the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST), Einstein Probe (EP) X-ray mission, Chandra X-ray Observatory, Wide Field Survey Telescope (WFST), and Space Variable Objects Monitor/Visible Telescope (SVOM/VT). The 13.08 hr FAST follow-up campaign without pulse detection requires an energy distribution flatter than those of well-known repeating FRBs, suggesting that this burst is likely a one-off event. A prompt EP follow-up and multiepoch observational campaign totaling >100 ks led to the detection of an X-ray source within the angular resolution of its Follow-up X-ray Telescope (FXT; 10″). A subsequent Chandra observation revealed this source to be offset by 7″ from the FRB position and established a 0.5–10 keV flux upper limit of 7.6 × 10 −15 erg cm −2 s −1 at the FRB position, corresponding to ∼10 39 erg s −1 at the 40 Mpc distance of the host galaxy NGC 4141. These results set one of the most stringent limits on X-ray emission from a nonrepeating FRB, disfavoring ultraluminous X-ray sources as counterparts of apparently one-off FRBs and offering critical insights into afterglow models. Our study suggests that an arcsecond localization of both the FRB and its potential X-ray counterpart is essential for exploring the X-ray counterpart of an FRB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: