Clinically acceptable marginal fit observed in both zirconia crown types, though conventional sintering led to better outcomes.
Conventional zirconia crowns demonstrated significantly superior marginal fit compared to high-speed sintered variants.
In vitro study evaluated the differences in marginal fit across sintering programs for zirconia crowns.
Findings suggest that conventional sintering may provide improved clinical reliability in crown fit.
Abstract
Crowns produced via both sintering programs were clinically acceptable, although the regular-speed-sintering program yielded a significantly superior marginal fit.
Perguntar à IA
Like
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper
Perguntar à IA
Like
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper
Comparative evaluation of marginal fit in conventional versus high-speed-sintered zirconia crowns: an in vitro study | Synapse