Key result
Tenecteplase matches alteplase in prosthetic valve thrombosis, boosting complete thrombolytic success by ~18%.
Why the study?
Does tenecteplase improve complete thrombolytic success and reduce major complications compared to alteplase in adult patients with obstructive mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis?
RCT (n=83)
Open-label
Parallel-group
No
Does tenecteplase improve complete thrombolytic success and reduce major complications compared to alteplase in adult patients with obstructive mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tenecteplase is a safe and effective alternative to alteplase for obstructive mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis, offering higher rates of complete thrombolytic success and shorter hospital stays.
Importance For patients presenting with symptomatic prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) after mechanical heart valve replacement, thrombolytic therapy with alteplase is accepted as a first-line therapeutic alternative. The utility of tenecteplase compared with conventional regimens remains unstudied, to the authors’ knowledge, in this patient population. Objective To assess the relative safety and efficacy of tenecteplase compared with standard infusions of alteplase in patients with PVT. Design, Setting and Participants This was an open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial among consecutive adult patients presenting with obstructive PVT of a mechanical prosthetic valve over the study period from October 2022 to August 2024 to a single tertiary care center in India. Interventions Patients received thrombolytic therapy with a low-dose slow infusion alteplase or weight-based bolus doses of tenecteplase. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were to determine the rates of complete thrombolytic success and the incidence of major complications. Results A total of 83 patients (mean [SD] age, 39.6 [12.4] years, 42 male [50.6%]) were randomized to receive alteplase (n = 43) or tenecteplase (n = 40). The rates of the primary efficacy end point (complete thrombolytic success) were significantly higher (risk ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.39; P = .02 for noninferiority) in the tenecteplase group (39 patients [97.5%]) compared with the alteplase group (35 patients [81.5%]). Additionally, patients treated with tenecteplase had higher rates of complete success with the first administered dose and a shorter duration of hospital stay (median [IQR], 4.1 [3.2-5.1] days vs 6.5 [4.3-9.2] days; P < .001). The rates of major and minor adverse events were similar. Conclusions and Relevance Tenecteplase may be a safe and effective alternative to alteplase in patients presenting with obstructive PVT. Patients treated with tenecteplase in our study had higher rates of complete thrombolytic success and a shorter duration of hospital stay. Furthermore, the relative ease of drug administration with tenecteplase may translate to greater clinical benefit in a real-world setting. Trial Registration Clinical Trials Registry of India: CTRI/2022/10/046127
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shukla et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis (n=83). Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase was evaluated on Complete thrombolytic success (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.39, p=0.02 for noninferiority). Tenecteplase was noninferior to alteplase for complete thrombolytic success in patients with obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis (RR 1.18; 95% CI 1.03-1.39; P=0.02 for noninferiority).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: