Key result
Incomplete revascularisation linked to ~133% higher risk of CV death or MI vs complete revascularisation.
Why the study?
Does complete revascularisation defined by FFR CT reduce cardiovascular death or spontaneous myocardial infarction in patients with new-onset stable angina?
Cohort (n=900)
Yes
Does complete revascularisation defined by FFR CT reduce cardiovascular death or spontaneous myocardial infarction in patients with new-onset stable angina?
Complete revascularisation guided by non-invasive FFR CT is associated with a sustained long-term reduction in cardiovascular death and spontaneous myocardial infarction in patients with stable angina.
Background Complete revascularisation has been associated with improved short-term outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease, but whether these benefits persist long-term and can be defined non-invasively remains uncertain. We investigated the long-term prognostic impact of complete versus incomplete revascularisation determined by coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ). Methods In this prospective multicentre study, 900 patients with new-onset stable angina and at least one coronary stenosis of 30% or greater on coronary CT angiography were followed for a median of 7 years. FFR CT values were obtained for each vessel, and patients were categorised as completely revascularised (all vessels with FFR CT ≤0.80 revascularised), incompletely revascularised (one or more vessels with FFR CT ≤0.80 not revascularised), or with normal physiology (all vessels with FFR CT >0.80). Early revascularisation was defined as treatment within 90 days of the index scan. Quantitative coronary plaque burden was assessed using artificial intelligence-enabled plaque analysis. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or spontaneous myocardial infarction. Results Of 900 patients, 210 (23%) were classified as incompletely revascularised, 167 (19%) as completely revascularised and 523 (58%) as having normal physiology. The primary endpoint occurred in 34 of 210 (16.2%) incompletely revascularised patients, 13 of 167 (7.8%) completely revascularised patients and 30 of 523 (5.7%) with normal physiology. Incomplete revascularisation was associated with higher risk compared with complete revascularisation (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.42; p=0.01) and normal physiology (HR 3.54, 95% CI 2.16 to 5.81; p<0.001). These associations remained significant after adjustment for total plaque burden, and the risk difference persisted beyond 3 years of follow-up. Conclusion Complete revascularisation defined by CT-derived fractional flow reserve was associated with a sustained reduction in cardiovascular death and spontaneous myocardial infarction over 7 years, supporting its potential role as a non-invasive tool to guide revascularisation strategies in stable coronary artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Stable coronary artery disease (n=900). Incomplete revascularisation vs. Complete revascularisation was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death or spontaneous myocardial infarction (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.42, p=0.01). Incomplete revascularisation was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular death or spontaneous myocardial infarction compared to complete revascularisation (HR 2.33; 95% CI 1.23-4.42; p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: