This investigation demonstrates nicotine promotes invasion and cellular proliferation in cervical cancer, suggesting LY294002 could inhibit these effects.
Nicotine exerts a substantial influence on cervical carcinogenesis by affecting the malignant progression of human papillomavirus (HPV)–18 positive and HPV‐negative cervical cancer cells, as well as HPV‐immortalized cervical epithelial cells. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the impact of nicotine on HPV‐16 positive cervical cancer. This study investigated the molecular mechanisms of nicotine in HPV‐16‐positive cervical (SiHa) cells. First, we conducted cell counting kit‐8, flow cytometry, wound healing, transwell assays to evaluate cellular proliferation, migration, and invasion capabilities. The data illustrated that nicotine‐treated SiHa cells displayed stronger malignant transformation capability compared to the control ( p < 0.05). Furthermore, western blot analysis was used to evaluate the expression changes of cellular proteins in SiHa cells. The results revealed that nicotine induces a significant upregulation of PI3K, AKT, phosphorylated AKT (Ser473) (p‐AKT), the p‐AKT/AKT ratio, and matrix metalloproteinase‐2 (MMP‐2), along with a marked increase in its secretion. Also, it was accompanied by the suppression of tumor suppressor p53 and decreased levels of p21 and Caspase‐3, as well as the active form of Caspase‐3 (cleaved Caspase‐3), indicating suppression of apoptosis. Critically, the use of a PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) demonstrated that the nicotine‐induced downregulation of p53 and upregulation of MMP‐2, as well as the enhancement of cellular invasion are dependent on PI3K/AKT pathway activation. These findings conclusively demonstrate that nicotine promotes the malignant transformation of HPV‐16 positive cervical cancer cells by altering the expressions of MMP‐2, p53, Caspase‐3, and p21 via the activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway. This highlights the therapeutic potential of targeting this pathway in cervical cancer treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: