Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis reveals elevated hepatitis B virus DNA is crucial for specialist referral, indicating a need for improved medical care pathways.
Background and Aims Linkage of hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐infected individuals to medical care is a major hurdle in the HBV elimination care cascade. This study aimed to investigate the rate and factors influencing specialist referral of HBV cases identified in health check programs. Methods This was a retrospective study among consecutive individuals undergoing health check programs with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) tested in a hospital from 2014 to 2023. Clinical data were captured from the hospital electronic database. Letter of referral after health check was recorded. Results A total of 28 940 individuals underwent health check with HBsAg tested. Six hundred and seventy‐three HBsAg‐positive individuals were eligible for analysis. Overall, 322 (47.8%) individuals received referral to hepatology specialist. There was a trend of increasing referral with time over the 10 years; trend slope (95% confidence interval): 5.0% (3.5%–6.4%) per year; p < 0.001. HBV DNA was tested in 207 (30.8%) individuals. On multivariable analysis, with reference to individuals with no HBV DNA tested, HBV DNA ≥ 2000 IU/mL was the strongest independent factor associated with referral (adjusted odds ratio 21.42; 95% confidence interval 8.79–52.24; p < 0.001). Detectable HBV DNA < 2000 IU/mL had a modest association with referral (adjusted odds ratio 1.84; 95% confidence interval 1.08–3.11; p = 0.024). Conclusions Elevated HBV DNA is an important factor associated with specialist referral among HBsAg‐positive individuals identified at health check programs. These findings suggest that implementing reflex HBV DNA testing could be a key strategy to improve specialist referral and facilitate linkage to care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: