Clinicians undertaking research alongside clinical duties improve patient outcomes, suggesting the need for consistent titling in healthcare settings.
Clinicians, who engage in research alongside their clinical duties, not only improve patient outcomes but contribute to cultural and workforce benefits for their healthcare organisations. The nomenclature of workplace titles for these roles has evolved over time and across international and geographical boundaries, as has the perceived level of research expertise or qualifications required. We propose that consistent titling for these roles would be of significant benefit for individuals, as well as healthcare leaders, and in the Australian context, clinicians conducting relevant research as part of their role, and who have a PhD or recognised research qualification, should be titled ‘Clinician Scientists’.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cruickshank et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: