This assessment demonstrates improved predictive accuracy in property valuation, highlighting the role of explainable AI using genetic algorithms.
Purpose This study proposes a novel BIM-integrated, explainable and scalable framework for property valuation. It aims to enhance predictive accuracy and transparency by combining IFC-based feature extraction with a genetic algorithm enhanced ensemble learning, addressing key limitations of traditional and opaque AI models in the built environment. Design/methodology/approach An IFC-based pipeline converts BIM geometry and semantics into machine-readable features. A genetic algorithm-enhanced gradient boosting regressor (GA-GBR) is trained and tested on 152 k transactions from China, and then further tested from building-type perspective at smaller scales. Hyperparameter optimization is performed using a genetic algorithm, and model interpretability is enabled through SHAP. Findings The GA-GBR model outperforms 11 benchmark models, achieving a 3–4.6% gain on MAPE over recent state-of-the-art methods. SHAP analysis identifies key predictors – local price level, transaction timing and floor area – while submarket results highlight context-specific drivers such as elevator presence in high-rise buildings. GA-based optimization enhances both predictive performance and feature relevance. Practical implications The framework supports automated, explainable and scalable valuation using BIM-derived features, enabling end-to-end deployment and informed decision-making. It offers valuers, designers and policymakers a transparent tool for assessing property value at multiple scales. Originality/value This is the first study to integrate GA-optimized ensemble learning, IFC-derived features and xAI techniques into a unified BIM-valuation workflow validated against real-world data. It contributes to methodological advancement while facilitating industry adoption of explainable AI applications in the built environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: