PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery2 citationsOpen Access

Glioblastoma survival prediction through MRI and clinical data integration with transfer learning

View Full Paper
DMDavide MilesiMGMarina GrisoliARAlberto Redaelli

Key Points

  • Survival prediction accuracy reached F1 score of 0.71 in glioblastoma patients, showcasing effective transfer learning integration.
  • Feature extraction methods employed include random forest classifiers, resulting in robust predictive performance.
  • Assessment utilized principal component analysis to streamline multi-modal MRI data and enhance feature efficiency.
  • This framework highlights advancements in radiomics, enabling better prognostic tools for glioblastoma treatment.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Accurate prediction of overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma patients is critical for advancing personalized treatments and improving clinical trial design. Conventional radiomics approaches rely on manually engineered features, which limit their ability to capture complex, high-dimensional imaging patterns. This study employs a deep learning architecture to process MRI data for automated glioma segmentation and feature extraction, leveraging high-level representations from the encoder’s latent space. Methods: Multimodal MRI data from the BraTS2020 dataset and a proprietary dataset from Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (Milan, Italy) were processed independently using a U-Net-like model pre-trained on BraTS2018 and fine-tuned on BraTS2020. Features extracted from the encoder’s latent space represented hierarchical imaging patterns. These features were combined with clinical variable (patient’s age) and reduced via principal component analysis (PCA) to enhance computational efficiency. Machine learning classifiers—including random forest, XGBoost, and a fully connected neural network—were trained on the reduced feature vectors for OS classification. Results: In the four-modality BraTS4CH setting, the multi-layer perceptron achieved the best performance (F1 = 0.71, AUC = 0.74, accuracy = 0.71). When limited to two modalities on BraTS2020 (BraTS2CH), MLP again led (F1 = 0.67, AUC = 0.70, accuracy = 0.67). On the IRCCS Besta two-modality cohort (Besta2CH), XGBoost produced the highest F1-score and accuracy (F1 = 0.65, accuracy = 0.66), while MLP obtained the top AUC (0.70). These results are competitive with—and in some metrics exceed—state-of-the-art reports, demonstrating the robustness and scalability of our automated framework relative to traditional radiomics and AI-driven approaches. Conclusion: Integrating encoder-derived features from multimodal MRI data with clinical variables offers a scalable and effective approach for OS prediction in glioblastoma patients. This study demonstrates the potential of deep learning to address traditional radiomics limitations, paving the way for more precise and personalized prognostic tools.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Milesi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/693624ba4fa91c937236c7d0https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03548-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Brain Tumor Segmentation and Survival Prediction Using Multimodal MRI Scans With Deep Learning2019 · 277 citations
  2. 2Addressing challenges in radiomics research: systematic review and repository of open-access cancer imaging datasets2023 · 25 citations
  3. 3The Design of SimpleITK2013 · 794 citations
  4. 4elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration2009 · 4,409 citations
  5. 5Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition2016 · 228,507 citations