Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Metagenomic analysis revealed seasonal shifts in pathogens like Salmonella and Staphylococcus in primates, indicating zoonotic risks.
Understanding the diversity of pathogenic microorganisms in wild primates is essential for assessing their health and zoonotic risks. In this study, metagenomic sequencing was applied to investigate the composition and seasonal dynamics of potential pathogenic microorganisms in the feces of François’ langurs. A total of 77 potential pathogenic taxa were identified, mainly belonging to Bacillota and Pseudomonadota. The most abundant genera were Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Salmonella, Listeria, and Pseudomonas, while dominant species included Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli. Significant seasonal differences were detected in both α- and β-diversity indices, with higher microbial diversity in spring and distinct community structures across seasons. Several genera and species, including Vibrio, Chlamydia, Mycobacteroides, Vibrio cholerae, Yersinia enterocolitica, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Mycobacteroides abscessus, showed marked seasonal fluctuations. The findings reveal that the pathogenic microbial community of François’ langurs is strongly shaped by seasonal environmental factors. The detection of multiple zoonotic pathogens suggests a potential risk of cross-species transmission, providing valuable baseline data for primate disease ecology and conservation health management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: