In the context of pavement management systems (PMSs), overloaded trucks impose severe economic and environmental burdens by accelerating pavement deterioration and increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Existing research on Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) placement has rarely incorporated environmental impacts, particularly greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, into the decision-making process. Instead, most studies have focused on infrastructure damage and have paid limited attention to how enforcement interacts with driver evasion behavior and schedule-related constraints. To address this gap, this study develops a bi-level optimization framework that simultaneously minimizes PMS costs, travel costs, and environmental (GHG) costs. The upper-level problem represents the total social cost minimization, while the lower-level problem models drivers’ routes and demand shift. The framework endogenously captures utility-based demand shifts, allowing overloaded drivers to switch to legal operations when enforcement and schedule-related constraints outweigh overloading benefits. A numerical study using the Sioux Falls network demonstrates that dual WIM installations significantly outperform single configurations, achieving network-wide cost reductions of up to 1.5% compared to 0.4%. Notably, PMS costs for overloaded trucks decreased by nearly 60%, confirming the effectiveness of strategic enforcement. Ultimately, this study contributes a unified decision-support tool that reframes WIM enforcement from a passive control measure into a proactive strategy for sustainable freight management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeohyun Jung (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: