Case-control study shows logistic regression links maternal age and zinc to orofacial cleft risk in children.
Background Orofacial clefts (OFCs) are complex congenital anomalies influenced by both genetic and environmental factors, with maternal folate long recognized as a modifiable risk factor. Aim This study investigated the association between maternal plasma folate levels and OFC risk and assessed contributions of other nutritional factors. Methods A case–control study was conducted in Kumasi, Ghana, involving 103 cases (children with OFCs) and controls (children without OFCs) (January to July 2024). Data were collected through interviewer-administered questionnaires and 24-h dietary recalls. Plasma folate was measured with a Human Folate ELISA kit, and BMI obtained by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis device. Other variables included dietary intake of vitamin B 12 , B 6 , iron, zinc, BMI, and maternal age. Plasma folate was categorized as low (< 159.88 ng/mL), intermediate (159.88–293.06 ng/mL), and high (>293.06 ng/mL). Logistic regression assessed associations. Results Low plasma folate levels were observed in 52.4% of the case mothers versus 28.2% of controls ( p = 0.0004). In the unadjusted model, high folate was linked to increased OFC odds (odds ratio (OR) = 2.192, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.081–4.447), while low folate showed non-significant elevated odds (OR = 1.229, 95% CI: 0.638–2.367). After adjustment, plasma folate was no longer significant. Independent predictors were dietary folate (OR = 1.009, 95% CI: 1.003–1.015), iron (OR = 0.871, 95% CI: 0.785–0.967), vitamin B 6 (OR = 0.335, 95% CI: 0.118–0.949), vitamin B 12 (OR = 0.751, 95% CI: 0.604–0.935), and maternal age (OR = 1.148, 95% CI: 1.012–1.302). Summary Plasma folate alone provides an incomplete assessment of OFC risk. Considering maternal nutritional profiles as a whole provides a more comprehensive understanding of risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solomon Obiri‐Yeboah (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: