Multicenter randomized controlled trial reveals fewer re-operations in infants with contralateral exploration, suggesting a cost-effective approach despite hospital admission and complication concerns
Background: An MCIH occurs in 7-15% of infants undergoing unilateral hernia repair, requiring a second anesthesia and surgery. CE can prevent development of MCIH, but also exposes infants to additional risks if no contralateral hernia is present. This study assesses the (cost)effectiveness of open primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair with and without contralateral exploration (CE) in infants aged 0-6 months to prevent second surgery for metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH). Methods: This multicenter randomized controlled trial randomly assigned infants to open unilateral inguinal hernia repair with CE (intervention group) or without CE (control group). Infants aged 0-6 months with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia undergoing open hernia repair were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcome was number of re-operations within one year after primary surgery and the subsequent number needed to treat (NNT). Secondary outcomes included operation time, hospital admission(s), complications, parental distress and anxiety. An additional economic evaluation was performed. Results: Re-operation was performed in four out of 204 patients in the intervention group and 12 out of 198 patients in the control group (2.0% vs 6.1%, OR95%CI 0.3(0.1, 1.0)), with a NNT of 24. Six re-operations in the control group were because of MCIH. Mean total operation time was shorter in the control group. Hospital admission, complication rate and parental distress and anxiety did not differ between groups. The intervention had a relatively high probability of being cost-effective. Conclusion: Additional CE results in fewer re-operations compared with unilateral repair alone. However, the NNT is high (n = 24), therefore CE should not be implemented as standard care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anema et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: