Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Field experiment reports profitable struvite alternatives to phosphorus fertilizers in potatoes, indicating environmental cost benefits.
Phosphorus (P) fertilizers are essential but potentially inefficient, especially in shallowrooted potatoes. A 3-year field experiment (2016-2018) was conducted in four distinct sites in Eastern Canada to investigate economic and environmental impacts of struvite-based slow-release and conventional P fertilizers in potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.). Marginal return (MR = gross revenue-total operating cost) was assessed for different P treatments (0, 60, 120, 180, and 240 kg P 2 O 5 ha -1 ) from triple super phosphate (TSP) and for different mixtures of struvite (25%, 50%, and 75%) and TSP at 180 P 2 O 5 kg ha -1 . Comparable MRs to TSP at a rate of 180 kg P2O5 ha- 1 were obtained with a mixture of 75% TSP and 25% struvite across sites and years. Results demonstrated that a struvite-based mixture can be a viable alternative to conventional P fertilizers, improving profitability and lowering potential cumulative environmental costs associated with P application by $8-$24 ha -1 year -1 for potato production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khakbazan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: