PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information1 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Framework for Multi-Modal Accessibility Assessment Within the 15-Minute City Concept: Application to Parks and Playgrounds in an Indian Urban Neighborhood

View Full Paper
TSThorsten SchuetzeSungkyunkwan University

Key Points

  • Assess multi-modal accessibility to parks and playgrounds in an urban neighborhood using different tools.
  • Applied the SusTAIN framework to evaluate accessibility in urban neighborhoods.
  • Compared QGIS, OSMnx, and Space Syntax for accessibility assessments.
  • Evaluated accessibility under varying grid resolutions and transportation modes.
  • QGIS demonstrated consistent results at a micro-scale of 25 m.
  • OSMnx showed better accuracy at a coarse scale of 100 m+.
  • Highlighted spatial disparities in accessibility across tools and transportation modes.

Abstract

Urban neighborhoods in India face an uneven distribution and limited accessibility to parks and playgrounds, particularly in dense mixed-use areas where rapid urbanization constrains green infrastructure planning. To address these challenges, the Sustainable Transportation Assessment Index (SusTAIN) framework was developed to evaluate sustainable transportation in Indian urban neighborhoods, with ‘Accessibility’ identified as a crucial subtheme. Recent advancements in Geographic Information Systems (GISs) and urban data analysis tools have enabled accessibility assessments of parks and playgrounds at a neighborhood scale, yet the OSMnx approach has been only marginally explored and compared in the literature. This study addresses this gap by comparing three tools—the Quantum Geographic Information System (QGIS), OSMnx, and Space Syntax—for accessibility assessments of parks and playgrounds in Ward 60 of Kalyan Dombivli city, based on the 15-Minute City concept. Accessibility was evaluated using 25 m and 100 m grid resolutions under peak and non-peak conditions across public and private transportation modes. The findings show that QGIS offers highly consistent results at micro-scale (25 m), while OSMnx provides better accuracy at coarser scales (100 m+). The results were validated with space syntax through integration and choice values. The comparison highlights spatial disparities in accessibility across different tools and transportation modes, including Intermediate Public Transport (IPT), which remains underexplored despite its crucial role in last-mile connectivity. The presented approach can support municipal authorities in optimizing neighborhood mobility and is transferable for applying the SusTAIN framework in other urban contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thorsten Schuetze (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/693624c34fa91c937236ccbchttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14120479
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper