In many gold–antimony deposits throughout the world, the sequence of Au and Sb precipitation varies significantly. In high-temperature systems such as hydrothermal Au deposits, gold typically precipitates prior to antimony, whereas in lower-temperature systems (e.g., Carlin-type deposits), no consistent depositional sequence is observed. The Gutaishan Au-Sb deposit, located in the Xiangzhong Basin of the Jiangnan Orogenic Belt, South China, exhibits a distinct spatial segregation within a continuously evolving system of gold and antimony mineralization—a pattern commonly observed in many Au-Sb deposits throughout the region. To elucidate the mechanisms controlling Au-Sb co-occurrence and segregation, we conducted electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA–ICP–MS) major and trace element analyses of stibnite and pyrite from quartz veins across different ore zones within the Gutaishan deposit. Trace element signatures—such as Cu-Pb correlations and Hg/(Cu + Pb) ratios which classify stibnite into Woxi-type and Xikuangshan-type, and Co/Ni ratios classifies pyrite into magmatic–hydrothermal and sedimentary types—suggest that the ore-forming fluids were predominantly magmatic–hydrothermal in origin, with minor contributions from metamorphic basement fluids. The occurrence of low-temperature trace element signatures in the Au-Sb deposit indicates that temperature is the primary control on Au-Sb segregation. The thermodynamic model further confirms that high-temperature fluids favored the precipitation of Au veins, while lower-temperature fluids facilitated the co-precipitation of stibnite and gold in Sb-Au veins. Therefore, we propose a metallogenic model for the Gutaishan deposit that highlights temperature-driven Au-Sb segregation, resulting from the progressive cooling of the ore-forming fluids.
Ning et al. (Thu,) studied this question.