PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery8 citations

Treatment Interruption and Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer

View Full Paper
LGLaila A. GharzaiMSMatthew J. SchipperKKKelley M. Kidwell

Key Points

  • To assess how interruptions in radiotherapy influence locoregional failure and overall survival in patients with head and neck cancer.
  • Retrospective analysis of three randomized clinical trials
  • Included patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)
  • Used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the impact of RT interruption on outcomes.
  • 1549 patients included, with 439 experiencing RT interruption
  • Binary RT interruption associated with hazard ratios of 1.04 for LRF and 1.22 for OS
  • 7-day RT interruption linked to a 4.1% decrement in LRF for p16-positive OPSCC and 9.1% for LAHNSCC.

Abstract

Importance Historical evidence demonstrated that delays or interruptions in radiotherapy (RT) are associated with poorer oncologic outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Substantial concerns arose during the COVID-19 pandemic, when treatment schedules were frequently disrupted. Objective To determine the association of RT interruptions with locoregional failure (LRF) and overall survival (OS). Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective review and secondary analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials (NRG/RTOG 0129, 0522, and 1016) included patients enrolled in the trials who were treated with RT. Patients with HNSCC were grouped as (1) p16-positive oropharynx (p16 + OPSCC) and (2) p16-negative oropharynx and all other subsites regardless of p16 status (called locally advanced HNSCC LAHNSCC)). Cox proportional hazards models were fit to assess the association of an RT interruption (binary model) and length of RT interruption (continuous model) with LRF and OS. Exposures Presence of RT interruption. Main Outcomes and Measures LRF and OS. Results There were 1549 patients (200 female patients 12.9%; mean SD age, 57 6 years; 1048 p16+ OPSCC 67.7%; 501 LAHNSCC 32.3%) who were included in the binary model; 439 (28.3%) had RT interruption. There were 1083 patients (69.9%) with available length of RT interruption (continuous model). A binary RT interruption was associated with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.04 (95% CI, 0.90-1.36) for LRF and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.99-1.50) for OS. As a continuous predictor, each 7-day interruption corresponded to HRs of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.12-1.89) for LRF and 1.41 (95% CI, 1.07-1.86) for OS. Analyses did not indicate effect modification by p16 status, and results are presented from models that estimated the effect of RT interruption across both groups. Using covariate-adjusted predictions from models that included clinical and tumor characteristics, a mean 7-day interruption in RT was associated with a 3-year LRF decrement of 4.1% in p16 + OPSCC and 9.1% in LAHNSCC. Predicted 3-year LRF detriment due to RT interruption ranged from 2.0% for a patient with non-T4, non-N3, p16 + OPSCC to 11.2% for a patients with LAHNSCC with a T4N3 p16-negative cancer. Conclusions and Relevance The secondary analysis suggests that RT treatment interruptions may be negatively associated with LRF and OS in HNSCC, but the magnitude of the association varies depending on p16 status and clinical characteristics. While treatment interruptions should globally be discouraged, patients with LAHNSCC or higher-stage disease may be most affected. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00047008 ; NCT00265941 ; NCT01302834

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gharzai et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/693624ce4fa91c937236cda5https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2025.4203
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper