Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 8, 2025BloodOpen Access

Isatuximab (Isa) subcutaneous (SC) via an on-body injector (OBI) vs isa intravenous (IV), plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): East asia subgroup results from the randomized, non-inferiority, phase 3 iraklia study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ZXZhongjun XiaJLJing LiuCSChunyan Sun

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Randomized trial showed subcutaneous isatuximab improved patient satisfaction in East Asian RRMM patients, suggesting benefits over intravenous administration.

Key Points

  • This research aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of subcutaneous isatuximab compared to intravenous isatuximab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients in East Asia.
  • Multicenter, open-label trial enrolling patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma aged ≥18 years.
  • Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive isatuximab subcutaneous or intravenous alongside pomalidomide and dexamethasone.
  • Endpoints included overall response rate, observed isatuximab concentration, and patient satisfaction measured by a questionnaire.
  • Overall response rates were 74.0% for subcutaneous and 70.9% for intravenous administration.
  • Subcutaneous administration resulted in higher patient satisfaction rates at 64.0% versus 52.7% for intravenous.
  • Infusion reactions occurred in 0% of the subcutaneous group compared to 21.8% in the intravenous group.

Cite This Study

Xia et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/693624d74fa91c937236d16chttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-5819
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share