⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

December 4, 2025Science

Can a smaller U.S. National Academies remain relevant?

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

To explore the impact of reduced federal support on the U.S. National Academies' operations.
Analysis of funding changes
Examination of staffing and committee structures
Identified link between federal support loss and staff layoffs
Noted reduction in the number of expert committees

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source→

Implication

Reports decline in federal support leading to staff layoffs at the National Academies, suggesting challenges ahead.

Abstract

Loss of federal support leads to staff layoffs and fewer committees of outside experts

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Jeffrey Mervis (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69362f364fa91c937236d293 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aee4263

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Neil Shubin wants NAS to stay relevantOriginal Research · 2026
2Attendance drops at some U.S. conferences, but others hold steadyOriginal Research · 2026
3'The ship is going down and we are powerless'- The Impact of Federal Funding Changes on Researchers Training the Next Generation of Scientists2025 · 3 citations
4National Science Foundation Faces Deep Funding CutsOriginal Research · 2026
5Declining contribution of the United States federal government to global research corpus2025

Lessons in resistance from Tim Snyder2026
A democracy tax in support of science2026
If it ain’t broke…2026
Chiral altermagnon in MnTeScience · 2026
The global geography of threats to freshwater biodiversityScience · 2026

More from Science