Pilot study shows a high complete response rate in elderly DLBCL patients treated with rituximab and lenalidomide, indicating potential for effective chemotherapy-free therapies.
Our previous pilot study demonstrated that the combination of sintilimab, rituximab, and lenalidomide (sR2) is effective and well tolerated in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Therefore, we continued to expand the sample size to explore the efficacy and safety of sR2 ± polatuzumab vedotin in older patients with de novo DLBCL. Eligible patients were ≥70 years old, or ≥60 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥2, newly diagnosed DLBCL. Patients received up to eight 28-day cycles of lenalidomide (10 mg orally, days 1–21), rituximab (375 mg/m² IV, day 1), sintilimab (200 mg IV, day 1), and optionally polatuzumab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg IV, day 1; for 6 cycles). Response assessments were conducted after cycles 4 and 8. Patients achieving partial or complete response (CR) after induction received maintenance lenalidomide (10 mg/day, days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle) for up to 2 years or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was CR rate at the end of induction; secondary endpoints included 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Until May 7, 2025, 27 patients were enrolled. The median age was 77 years (range, 68–91), and 2 patients (7.4%) had ECOG PS ≥2. At the end of induction, 80.8% (21/26) achieved a response, with 85.7% (18/21) achieving CR. Among the 6 patients treated with sR2 plus polatuzumab vedotin, 5 achieved CR. After a median follow-up of 13.4 months, the estimated 2-year PFS and OS were 60.8% and 82.7%, respectively. The most common grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (22.2%), thrombocytopenia (14.8%), and anemia (11.1%). No treatment-related deaths were observed. The chemotherapy-free regimen of sR2± polatuzumab vedotin demonstrates promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in older patients with DLBCL. These findings warrant further prospective validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: