PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 12, 2025International Ophthalmology0 citationsOpen Access

Ophthalmic surgical simulator: an effective and safe approach for trainees in vitreoretinal surgery

View Full Paper
FGFederico GiannuzziUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreLHLorenzo HuUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMCMatteo Mario CarlàAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic

Key Points

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the EyeSi Surgical Simulator for trainees in vitreoretinal surgery.
  • Trainees underwent baseline and post-simulation ophthalmic examinations.
  • Assessments included ocular motility, fusional amplitudes, and stereopsis using the TNO stereotest.
  • Performance scores were compared before and after simulation sessions.
  • Far fusional amplitude increased significantly after simulator use (p = 0.003).
  • 52% of eyes achieved a TNO score of 60 arcsec post-simulation (p = 0.02).
  • All trainees showed improved performance scores following the simulation.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the EyeSi Surgical Simulator (VRmagic, Mannheim, Germany) in enhancing surgical proficiency among trainees performing vitreoretinal procedures. Methods Trainees underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic and orthoptic examination at baseline (T0) and 30 min after completing the simulation session (T1), which included the cover-uncover test, ocular motility assessment, fusional amplitudes, convergence measurements, and stereopsis evaluation using the TNO stereotest. A questionnaire evaluated 18 symptoms for frequency, severity, and bothersomeness. Performance scores from the first and final 15 min on the same module were compared. Results Orthoptic examinations were conducted before and 30 min after virtual reality (VR) simulator use on 34 trainees. Far fusional amplitude increased significantly both without (19.4 ± 8.8 Δ vs. 23.9 ± 9.7 Δ, p = 0.003) and with striated lenses (18.2 ± 10.4 Δ vs 20.5 ± 9.1 Δ, p = 0.02). Near fusional amplitude remained unchanged, regardless of striated glasses ( p = 0.52). At baseline, TNO score was 60 arcsec in 82% of trainees and 120 arcsec in 18%. After VR simulation, 52% of eyes scored 60 arcsec, 41% scored 120 arcsec, and 7% scored 240 arcsec ( p = 0.02). Ocular discomfort was reported by 32% of trainees, with symptoms rated as mild. All trainees’ performance score improved from initial to the final simulation session. Conclusions The EyeSi surgical simulator enhances surgical proficiency in vitreoretinal procedures with a minor, short-term reduction on stereopsis and a low incidence of mild discomfort.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Giannuzzi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694019032d562116f28f5ff6https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03851-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Eyesi direct ophthalmoscope simulator: an effective training tool for medical undergraduates2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2Effectiveness of the Eyesi Surgical Simulator for ophthalmology trainees: systematic review and meta-analysis2023 · 26 citations
  3. 3Visual fatigue while watching 3D stimuli from different positions2017 · 21 citations
  4. 4Construct validity of anterior segment anti-tremor and forceps surgical simulator training modules2008 · 93 citations
  5. 5Surgical training in ophthalmology: Role of EyeSi in the era of simulation-based learning2022 · 4 citations