Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cost-effectiveness analysis shows larotrectinib is favorable compared to standard of care for metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
From the perspective of healthcare payers in China, larotrectinib was cost-effective compared to standard of care as a second-line treatment or subsequent treatment for advanced or metastatic CRC patients with NTRK gene fusion-positive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: