PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 12, 2025Frontiers in Psychology12 citationsOpen Access

The impact mechanism of artificial intelligence dependence on college students’ innovation capability: an empirical study from China

View Full Paper
YFYuan FangHDHao DengNJNan Jiang

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how dependence on artificial intelligence influences college students' innovation capability.
  • Survey data collected from 1,032 students
  • Employed partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)
  • Utilized fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify pathways to high innovation capability
  • AI dependence significantly increases cognitive inertia
  • Cognitive inertia reduces innovation capability
  • Employment pressure enhances the positive effect of AI dependence on cognitive inertia
  • Low cognitive inertia is a core condition for high innovation capability

Abstract

Introduction The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has increased college students’ reliance on AI tools. While AI enhances learning efficiency, it may also undermine key cognitive processes required for innovation. Methods Using survey data from 1,032 students, this study employed partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine how AI dependence, cognitive inertia, employment pressure, and academic utilitarian atmosphere shape students’ innovation capability. Results AI dependence significantly increases cognitive inertia, with cognitive dependence ( β = 0.570, p 0.001) exerting a stronger effect than tool dependence ( β = 0.161, p 0.001). Cognitive inertia reduces innovation capability ( β = −0.111, p 0.001) and serves as a key mediator linking AI dependence to innovation. Employment pressure strengthens the positive effect of AI dependence on cognitive inertia ( β = 0.045, p 0.05). A stronger academic utilitarian atmosphere further amplifies the negative impact of cognitive inertia on innovation capability ( β = 0.052, p 0.05). The fsQCA results reveal multiple pathways to high innovation capability, with low cognitive inertia emerging as a core condition across all effective configurations. Discussion This study clarifies the cognitive mechanisms and contextual conditions through which AI dependence affects innovation. The findings extend research in educational technology and innovation psychology and offer practical guidance for universities to optimize learning environments, promote rational AI use, ease employment pressure, and improve academic culture.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6940190c2d562116f28f647fhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1732837
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper