PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 12, 2025Transplantation3 citationsOpen Access

The Association of Socioeconomic Status on Kidney Transplant Access and Outcomes: Cohort Studies of England and Northern Ireland

View Full Paper
MCMichael CorrJBJ. Swanson BeckACAisling E. Courtney

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how socioeconomic status affects kidney transplant access and outcomes in England and Northern Ireland.
  • Retrospective cohort study using national transplant registry data from England and Northern Ireland from 2000 to 2020
  • Socioeconomic status measured using national deprivation indices
  • Statistical analyses including Poisson regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and concentration indices
  • Lower socioeconomic status associated with reduced transplant access and poorer outcomes in England
  • Significant differences in graft survival observed with lower SES in England
  • Northern Ireland showed no significant SES-related differences in transplant access despite overall deprivation

Abstract

Background. While socioeconomic status (SES) is an established determinant of kidney transplant access and outcomes, less is known about how these disparities vary within universal healthcare systems. This study hypothesized that, despite shared healthcare and organ allocation systems, regional differences would be observed in the magnitude and pattern of the association between SES and transplant access and outcomes between England and Northern Ireland (NI). Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using national transplant registry data from England (n = 42 220) and NI (n = 1615) from 2000 to 2020. SES was measured using national deprivation indices. Outcomes included transplant incidence, preemptive and living donor transplantation, graft survival, and patient survival. Statistical analyses included Poisson regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and concentration indices to assess equity. Results. In England, lower SES was significantly associated with reduced transplant access (incidence rate ratio for most versus least deprived quintile, 0.71; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.69-0.73), lower rates of preemptive and living donor transplantation, and poorer graft (hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.32-1.50) and patient survival (hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.39-1.59). These disparities persisted across ethnic groups. In contrast, NI showed no significant SES-related differences in transplant access, despite a more deprived population overall. Conclusions. SES remains strongly associated with transplant access in England but not in NI, suggesting that regional models of healthcare delivery may mitigate or exacerbate inequities.These findings suggest a role of system design in promoting equity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Corr et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694019192d562116f28f6704https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0000000000005596
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper