Observational study evaluates the VetTriS effectiveness in prioritizing care for 164 dogs and cats, indicating reliable triage outcomes.
Objective To evaluate the applicability, reliability, and prioritization effectiveness of a 5‐point Veterinary Triage System (VetTriS) in a busy primary and secondary emergency department. Additionally, it was determined whether target waiting times could be met. Triage assessments performed by veterinary technicians and veterinary students were retrospectively assessed by the authors. Design Prospective observational study with retrospective analysis of data on applicability, reliability, and prioritization. Setting Primary and secondary emergency department. Animals One hundred sixty‐four cats and dogs presented at a primary and secondary emergency service. Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results Data from 164 dogs and cats admitted to a primary and secondary emergency department during the weekends of April to July of 2024 were analyzed. Triage performed using VetTriS by veterinary technicians and veterinary students demonstrated substantial interobserver agreement, with a kappa of 0.69. Overtriage occurred in 9.8% of patients and undertriage in 0.6%. The assigned target waiting time was met in 85.4%. VetTriS was unable to properly assess for prioritization within this study design and did not allow for good assessment of hydration status. Conclusions VetTriS is a reliable tool for use in veterinary emergency departments to triage patients and has substantial interobserver agreement. Although performing triage is difficult in a busy emergency center, the results of this study are promising. Further adjustments to VetTriS are needed, and future studies are needed to test for applicability and prioritization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Groesser et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: