Analysis reveals PTSD and depression significantly mediate chronic pain disability from lifetime violence in men, indicating health inequities.
Knowledge of association between violence and chronic pain in men is limited by neglect of violence experiences as perpetrator, disregard of heterogeneity in cumulative lifetime violence severity (CLVS), weak understanding of mediation pathways, and inattention to social determinants of health (SDOH). The CLVS‐44 measure and identification of four distinct latent profiles of CLVS facilitated addressing these shortcomings. CLVS‐44 data from a national cross‐sectional community survey of 587 Canadian men who had violence experiences as target and/or perpetrator were used in parallel multiple mediation analysis with a multi‐categorical profile antecedent. Differences among CLVS profiles for relative direct and indirect associations through injury, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to chronic pain disability were examined. Differences among profiles by SDOH were also explored. Compared to Profile 1 (Lowest CLVS), Profile 4 (Highest Target and Perpetrator) had significant relative direct and indirect effects through lifetime injuries and PTSD, with the highest mean scores for chronic pain disability and all mediators. Indirect effects through PTSD for Profiles 2 (second Lowest Target, Moderate Physical Partner Perpetrator) and 3 (second Highest Target, Low Psychological Perpetrator) were also significant. Masculine discrepancy stress, adverse housing, economic challenges, and substance use were significantly higher for Profile 4. These results demonstrate that high perpetration differentiates men most likely to have the highest chronic pain disability as indicated by direct and indirect pathways. Findings also highlight the need for trauma‐ and violence‐informed approaches to chronic pain assessment and management to avoid re‐traumatization. SDOH inequities may identify starting points for strength‐based interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wuest et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: