Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluation reveals the 3D framework enhances dynamic iodine capture in high-temperature scenarios, indicating its potential for nuclear waste management.
Efficient capture of radioactive iodine is crucial for nuclear safety and environmental protection, yet it remains challenging under dynamic, high-temperature off-gas conditions. Herein, we systematically evaluated the in-depth iodine removal performance of two antimony sulfide frameworks, a 2D-layered and a 3D-channeled architecture (denoted as the 2D-Sb₂S₃ framework and 3D-Sb₂S₃ framework), featuring electron-rich sulfide sites and soft Lewis acid antimony ions. Both materials exhibit modest static iodine uptake capacities (3.32 and 3.12 g g⁻¹, respectively), while the 3D framework achieves a superior dynamic capacity of 1.25 g g⁻¹ at 373 K, outperforming benchmark materials such as SCU-SnS (0.88 g g⁻¹) and Ag-loaded silica gel (0.54 g g⁻¹). The application potential of the 3D framework was further confirmed by the continuous accumulation of ¹³¹I₂ in a radioactive dynamic adsorption setup. Mechanism analysis combined with powder X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and time-dependent Raman spectroscopy reveals that iodine uptake proceeds via multiple pathways, including charge-transfer interactions with incorporated macrocyclic polyamines and the redox-induced formation of SbI₃. This work introduces a new design paradigm for redox-active metal sulfide adsorbents by leveraging soft acid/base interactions and framework reactivity, offering a viable approach for advanced iodine capture in nuclear waste management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: