Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This approach demonstrates how 3D printing improves electrical resistance and oxidation response in nanoporous copper, indicating potential for advanced material applications.
Micro-architected nanoporous metals are widely used in electrochemical and catalytic systems, but conventional powder metallurgy cannot readily produce structurally complex, microscale variants. We present a micro continuous liquid interface production (µCLIP)-based 3D printing followed by low-temperature sintering to fabricate hierarchical copper architectures with tunable porosity. Copper-monomer mixtures containing nanoporous copper powders and copper nanoparticles are printed into polymer matrix composites at a vertical speed of 4.17 μm·s⁻¹, with predicted and designed capillary imbibition of monomers into nanopores enabling high filler loading (62.21 vol.%). Subsequent sintering under a reducing atmosphere tailors nanoporosity and products' oxidation response. At 400 °C, sintering yields nanoporous networks that exhibit high chemical reactivity and unique self-disintegration behavior upon air exposure under a mechanical load, accompanied by an 8500-fold increase in electrical resistance. At 650 °C, sintering produces dense copper with improved oxidation resistance, exhibiting minimal resistance changes upon air exposure. This work establishes µCLIP as a scalable route to complex, hierarchical porous metal components for applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: