Mixed-methods study shows positive shifts in family engagement through the CARE framework, indicating a need for improved decision-making.
Out-of-school time (OST) STEM programs are well-positioned to strengthen family engagement, yet practical, theory-aligned tools remain limited. This early-stage mixed-methods study tests parent/caregiver (P/C) and staff (S) surveys based on Clover for Families developmental theory expressed through the CARE framework: Connect (welcoming climate, clear communication), Act (hands-on participation, at-home supports), Reflect (shared meaning-making, feedback), and Empower (family voice, decision-making). Nine OST STEM programs (eight U.S. states) co-designed/piloted CARE plans, activities, and surveys over six months. Quantitative data included baseline experiences (CARE practice frequency; n = 67 P/C, 42 S across nine programs), program-end reflection (retrospective perceptions of change; n = 26 P/C, 29 S), and forced-ranking (most/least important domains; n = 67 P/C, 42 S). Qualitative data from meetings, open responses, and interviews were analyzed to contextualize quantitative findings, which included strong internal consistency (P/C α = 0.83–0.95; S α = 0.77–0.95) and large retrospective gains in both groups across domains. Forced-ranking elevated Connect and Act over Reflect and Empower, highlighting a need to scaffold family involvement. Staff described CARE as useful and actionable. Findings show that CARE supports measurement and continuous improvement of STEM family engagement. Future work should test large-sample validity, link results to observed practice and youth outcomes, and refine Empowerment-related items for everyday agency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: