Simulation-based approach improves switch operation time prediction in distribution networks, suggesting better reliability and fault isolation.
The operational modes and fault characteristics of distribution networks incorporating distributed generation are becoming increasingly complex. This complexity increases the difficulty of predicting switch control action times and leads to scattered samples with data scarcity. Consequently, it imposes higher demands on rapid fault isolation and load transfer control following system failures. To address this issue, this paper proposes a switch action time prediction and synchronous load transfer control method based on Bayesian optimization of bidirectional long short-term memory (Bo-BiLSTM) networks. A distribution network simulation model incorporating distributed generation was constructed using MATLAB/Simulink (R2023a). Three-phase voltage and current at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC) were extracted as feature parameters to establish a switch operation timing database. Bayesian optimization was employed to tune the BiLSTM hyperparameters, constructing the Bo-BiLSTM prediction model to achieve high-precision forecasting of switch operation times under fault conditions. Subsequently, a load-synchronized transfer control strategy was proposed based on the prediction results. A dynamic delay mechanism was designed to achieve “open first and then close” sequential coordinated control. Physical experiments verified that the time difference between opening and closing was controlled within 2–12 milliseconds (ms), meeting the engineering requirement of less than 20 ms. The results demonstrate that the proposed control method enhances switch operation time prediction accuracy while effectively supporting rapid fault isolation and seamless load transfer in distribution networks, thereby improving system reliability and control precision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Long et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: