Rule-based knowledge base improves clinical decision-making in breast cancer radiotherapy, suggesting enhanced automation.
Background: Traditional text-based standard operating procedures (SOPs) have limitations in today's data-rich environment, as they provide limited support for automated reasoning, contextual guidance, and real-time clinical decision-making. We developed a rule-based knowledge base to overcome these challenges through digitalization of SOPs on breast cancer radiotherapy. Methods: We designed and developed a web application with a relational database structured around Common Data Elements (CDEs), a rule-based inference engine, and a responsive user interface (UI). The system's information retrieval success was evaluated in a single-center study over 14 months, where nine radiation oncologists submitted clinical queries and provided feedback on the relevance of the results. Results: The knowledge base incorporated 103 specific information entries covering 8 main topics, structured around critical clinicopathological features such as tumor stage, receptor status, grading, and lymphovascular invasion. During a 14-month testing period, nine radiation oncologists submitted 62 distinct clinical queries (e.g., determining boost indication for a patient of certain age and tumor situation). Of these queries, 56.5% were successfully answered as indicated by the user. Analysis of unsuccessful queries revealed that the information was mostly present but inaccessible due to user-experience issues. Conclusion: Our rule-based knowledge base demonstrates the feasibility of transforming static SOPs into interactive, evidence-linked resources. While promising, substantial user experience barriers remain. Future enhancements will prioritize user-interface improvements, sustainable knowledge-updating mechanisms, and AI integration to strengthen the system for practical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dennstädt et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: