θάττων, ταχίων (Phryn. Ecl. 52, Moer. θ 18, Moer. τ 7, [Hdn.] Philet. 18, Thom.Mag. 176.10–2)

Federica Benuzzi

doi:10.30687/dea/2974-8240/2025/02/030

December 10, 2025Armeniaca

θάττων, ταχίων (Phryn. Ecl. 52, Moer. θ 18, Moer. τ 7, [Hdn.] Philet. 18, Thom.Mag. 176.10–2)

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

To provide a philological and linguistic analysis of the comparative forms of θάττων and ταχίων.
Philological commentary on ancient Greek lexica.
Examination of comparative forms in context.
Identified nuances in the use of comparative forms.
Discussed references from various ancient lexica.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Linguistic analysis reveals subtle differences in comparative forms in ancient texts, indicating their usage nuances.

Abstract

This article provides a philological and linguistic commentary on the comparative forms θάττων and ταχίων discussed in the lexica Phryn. Ecl. 52, Moer. θ 18, Moer. τ 7, [Hdn.] Philet. 18, and Thom.Mag. 176.10–2.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Federica Benuzzi (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401b312d562116f28f7c67 https://doi.org/10.30687/dea/2974-8240/2025/02/030

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

θάττων, ταχίων (Phryn. Ecl. 52, Moer. θ 18, Moer. τ 7, [Hdn.] Philet. 18, Thom.Mag. 176.10–2)

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

θάττων, ταχίων (Phryn. Ecl. 52, Moer. θ 18, Moer. τ 7, [Hdn.] Philet. 18, Thom.Mag. 176.10–2)

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading