This study demonstrates valid assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness in senior football players using a standardised passing drill, indicating it may replace traditional methods.
This study examined the concurrent and criterion validity of a football-specific intermittent-variable submaximal fitness test (SMFT) as an indicator of cardiorespiratory fitness. Eighteen male senior football players were monitored over a 12-week period using a repeated measures design. Each week, a standardised Y-shape passing drill (practical SMFT) was administered immediately following a 4-min continuous run (criterion SMFT), with exercise heart rate (HRex) measured during both protocols. Laboratory-derived measures of cardiorespiratory fitness were assessed at the start and end of this period. The within-player correlation between HRex from the two SMFTs was large, with a clear improvement in the relationship (Δ r ≈0.2) and model fit (χ² = 52.1, p < 0.001; adjusted vs unadjusted model statistics: marginal-R² = 0.56 vs 0.29, Akaike information criterion = 434.8 vs 477.0, root mean square error = 1.63 vs 2.21%-points of HRmax) after adjusting for passing drill total and high-speed running distances. Adjusted HRex values from the passing drill showed stronger associations (r ≈-0.70 vs -0.35) with maximal oxygen uptake and maximal aerobic speed. A Y-shape passing drill offers a valid and practical assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness within the SMFT framework. We provide a method to guide practitioners in adjusting HRex for external training load, thereby improving agreement with criterion SMFT running protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shushan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: