Comparative analysis shows hybrid data collection improves documentation accuracy, indicating viable methods for traffic accident sites.
This study examines the possibilities of using hybrid data collection methods based on photogrammetric and LiDAR imaging for documenting traffic accident sites. The evaluation was performed with an iPhone 15 Pro and a viDoc GNSS receiver. Comparative measurements were made against instruments with higher accuracy. The test scenarios included measuring errors along a 25 m line and scanning a larger traffic area. Measurements were conducted under limiting conditions on a homogeneous surface without terrain irregularities or objects. The results show that although hybrid scanning cannot fully replace traditional surveying instruments, it provides accurate results for documenting traffic accident sites. The analysis additionally revealed an almost linear spread of errors on homogeneous asphalt surfaces. Moreover, it was confirmed that the use of a GNSS receiver and control points has a significant impact on the quality of the data. Such a comprehensive assessment of surface homogeneity has not been tested yet. To achieve accuracy, it is recommended to use a scanning mode based on at least 90% image overlap with RTK GNSS. The relative error rate on a linear section ranged from 0.5 to 1.0%, which corresponds to an error of up to 5 cm over a 5 m section. When evaluating a larger area using hybrid data collection, 93.38% of the points had an error below 10 cm, with a mean deviation of 6.2 cm. These findings expand current knowledge and define practical device settings and operational limits for the use of hybrid mobile scanning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Svatý et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: