PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 10, 2025Cancers9 citationsOpen Access

Oncolytic Viruses in Glioblastoma: Clinical Progress, Mechanistic Insights, and Future Therapeutic Directions

View Full Paper
JLJiayu LiuYWYuxin WangSSShichao Su

Key Points

  • This review aims to synthesize clinical progress and mechanistic insights regarding oncolytic viruses in glioblastoma.
  • Reviewed phase I-III trials of oncolytic viruses for glioblastoma treatment.
  • Analyzed the efficacy and safety profiles of various viral vectors.
  • Discussed combination therapies with chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  • Oncolytic viruses exhibited promising efficacy against glioblastoma.
  • Efficacy improved when combined with other therapies, like chemotherapy.
  • Persistent immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment poses challenges.

Abstract

High-grade gliomas—particularly glioblastoma (GBM)—remain refractory to standard-of-care surgery followed by chemoradiation, with a median overall survival of ~15 months. Oncolytic viruses (OVs), which selectively infect and lyse tumor cells while engaging antitumor immunity, offer a mechanistically distinct therapeutic modality. This review synthesizes clinical progress of OVs in GBM, with emphasis on oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV) and coverage of other vectors (adenovirus, reovirus, Newcastle disease virus, vaccinia virus) across phase I–III trials, focusing on efficacy and safety. Key observations include the encouraging clinical trajectory of oHSV exemplars—T-VEC (approved for melanoma) and G47Δ (approved in Japan for recurrent GBM)—the multi-center exploration of the adenovirus DNX-2401 combined with programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade, and the early-stage status of reovirus (pelareorep) and Newcastle disease virus programs. Emerging evidence indicates that oHSV therapy augments immune infiltration within the tumor microenvironment and alleviates immunosuppression, with synergy when combined with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Persistent challenges include GBM’s inherently immunosuppressive milieu, limitations imposed by the blood–brain barrier, intrapatient viral delivery and biodistribution, and concerns about viral shedding. Future directions encompass programmable vector design, optimization of systemic delivery, biomarker-guided patient selection, and rational combination immunotherapy. Collectively, OVs represent a promising immunotherapeutic strategy in GBM; further gains will hinge on vector engineering and precision combinations to translate mechanistic promise into durable clinical benefit.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401d412d562116f28f83fdhttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17243948
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Oncolytic Therapies for Glioblastoma: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives2025 · 13 citations
  2. 2Optimizing Oncolytic Virotherapy for Malignant Glioma: From Bench to Bedside2025 · 4 citations
  3. 3An oncolytic HSV-1 vector induces a therapeutic adaptive immune response against glioblastoma2024 · 16 citations
  4. 4Oncolytic viruses in brain cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and clinical trial outcomes2026
  5. 5Reprogramming the Immunosuppressive Microenvironment in Glioblastoma Through Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus Therapy: A Systematic Review2026