Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Method demonstrates multiple imputation can address missing data problems in multilevel models, enhancing estimation accuracy.
Consider the conventional multilevel model Y = C γ + Zu + e where γ represents fixed effects and ( u , e ) are multivariate normal random effects. The continuous outcomes Y and covariates C are fully observed with a subset Z of C . The parameters are θ = ( γ , var ( u ) , var ( e ) ) . Dempster, Rubin and Tsutakawa framed the estimation as a missing data problem, where ( Y , u ) are the complete data and the random effects u are conceived as missing data. Viewed in this way, the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm has proven to be a natural and popular approach to estimation. However, when C is partially observed or subject to measurement error, it is natural to formulate a multilevel model for C that includes random effects, ν . In this article, we extend this thinking to allow estimation of the joint distribution of data Y = ( Y , C ) = ( Y o , Y m ) and random effects b = ( u , v ) from observed data
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: