PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 9, 2025Structural Health Monitoring3 citationsOpen Access

Uncertainty propagation via sample-based deterministic model updating for structural damage identification

View Full Paper
MWMarlene WolniakBHBenedikt HofmeisterJRJasper Ragnitz

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance structural damage identification through improved uncertainty propagation and model updating.
  • Proposed the Sample-Based Deterministic Model Updating (SDMU) approach
  • Combined sample provision with a numerical optimization algorithm
  • Used a simple analytical application and a laboratory steel cantilever beam for demonstration
  • SDMU shows clear and distinct convergence behavior compared to Bayesian model updating
  • Demonstrated adaptability and independence from input data assumptions
  • Results indicate improved accuracy in reproducing structural behavior characteristics

Abstract

Structural health monitoring aims for the identification of damage. In order to identify damage using model updating, vibration measurement data is recorded, damage-sensitive features are identified and a numerical model is updated to match the structural behavior observed. However, uncertainty exists in every model updating application in structural dynamics. As established approaches for uncertainty quantification and propagation are dependent on previous assumptions regarding the input data (e.g., modal parameters), in this work, an alternative model updating procedure is proposed, namely the sample-based deterministic model updating (SDMU) approach. The key idea is to decouple the uncertainty incorporation from the actual model updating procedure by combining a sample provision with a numerical optimization algorithm. Using this approach, the uncertainty is incorporated indirectly through the performance of multiple deterministic model updating procedures based on each discrete input sample. The type of sample provision, just as the optimization algorithm, is freely selectable. The performance and adaptability of the proposed SDMU approach are demonstrated using a simple analytical application example and a laboratory steel cantilever beam with the aim of damage identification. Results are compared to the results of a benchmark Bayesian model updating (BMU) method, namely the transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Findings show that the BMU and SDMU outcomes directly reflect their input data, whereby the considered SDMU realizations show a clear and more distinct convergence behavior. This highlights the advantages of the SDMU approach: Adaptability to the problem at hand, independence from assumptions about the input data and correct reproduction of its characteristics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wolniak et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401d622d562116f28f8d9dhttps://doi.org/10.1177/14759217251387535
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Efficiency of grey wolf optimization algorithm for damage detection of skeletal structures via expanded mode shapes2020 · 103 citations
  2. 2Bayesian operational modal analysis: Theory, computation, practice2013 · 215 citations
  3. 3LII. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes, F. R. S. communicated by Mr. Price, in a letter to John Canton, A. M. F. R. S1763 · 2,906 citations
  4. 4No free lunch theorems for optimization1997 · 14,247 citations
  5. 5Scattered data interpolation methods for electronic imaging systems: a survey2002 · 648 citations