Qualitative interviews reveal differing financial regulations in South Africa and Zambia that impact savings groups and money lending.
Unregulated or weakly regulated financial institutions remain important providers of financial services across Sub-Saharan Africa. This study examines how such institutions operate in South Africa and Zambia, which represent contrasting regulatory approaches-restrictive and enabling, respectively. Drawing on qualitative interviews with providers and users, this research finds that group-based savings-and-credit associations and private money lending remain central in both contexts. In South Africa, savings groups are more closely connected with banks, while private money lending is criminalized. The findings suggest scope for regulatory convergence toward a more plural and competitive financial sector, one that actively supports savings groups while adopting less punitive approaches to private money lending.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tshaka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: